ENT Theology

by Kirk Spencer

00 ENT TheologyI recently found myself sitting at the “kid’s” table. Other than me, the ages ranged from 5 to 9. If you ever sat at the kid’s table, you will know if was all quite silly. However when the “conversation” wandered into theology, things began to get interesting.  Did you know that “we evolved from boogers sneezed from the nose of God and that Adam was the first man, except for the cavemen, because they don’t count.” Even at this impressionable age, we find attempts to mix the Word of God and the ideas of Man. The first single celled organisms may have looked like boogers and if God did the creating then it makes sense that they must have come from His nose. And if cavemen were older than Adam, then they would not count because the Bible is clear that Adam was first. (Theologians have also discussed the possibility of “preadamite man.”) Continue reading

Posted in Christian Life, Theology | 2 Comments

Sovereignty and Submission: Mary and the Christmas Story

by Joe Wooddell

mary and angelThe Christmas season is upon us, and there is so much we can learn from the various Scriptures that speak about the subject. In Luke 1:26-38 God’s power and Mary’s submission are clearly seen: “Nothing will be impossible with God,” and “Behold the bondslave of the Lord; be it done to me according to your word” (vv.37-38, NASB). As the season flies by us, let us not forget these two important lessons: God is powerful, and we, like Mary, ought humbly to submit. Continue reading

Posted in Christian Life, Theology | Leave a comment

The Lion’s Den: A Q&A with Criswell College Professors

Lion's Den Website Banner

Four Criswell College professors recently got together for a “Lion’s Den” panel where they answered difficult practical or theological questions submitted by students. Topics included prophetic dreams and visions, singleness and marriage, gluttony, and eschatology. Continue reading

Posted in Academics, Biblical Interpretation, Christian Life, Debates, Theology | Leave a comment

Endowed by Our CR

by Kirk Spencer

00.EndowedByOurBen Affleck said that “we are endowed by our CR…” He was attempting to quote that famous line from the Declaration of Independence—that we are “endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights.”  Ben only barely got the first two letters of creator, then quickly recovered and continued with “…our forefathers…” So we are now “endowed by our forefathers with certain unalienable rights.”

He may be right. Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Theology | Leave a comment

Maintaining Good Reading Habits

by Bill Watson

readingReading well is not easy. Many of us recognize the value of being well-read but few of us really know how to become well-read. Becoming well-read requires that we read books that are not necessarily of immediate interest to us. Many readers, particularly those who are not naturally inclined to reading deep books, focus on “low-grade” literature that is of dubious value. By “low-grade,” I mean here the kind of literature that relies almost entirely on evoking and provoking our immediate passions. These books are like roller-coasters or pop music, they assault our raw senses but rarely challenge the way we think about the world, about ourselves. Books that actually change us tend to be less immediately appealing to the novice reader. So it is important to think about how to keep reading interesting while still reading books that are important and influential. Continue reading

Posted in Academics | 1 Comment

Crying Moral Wolf

by Barry Creamer

crying wolfThose of us who believe in objectivity, truth, knowledge, (not to mention follow Jesus) hold that there is a fence between right and wrong, and that the fence doesn’t move. So it’s easy to understand why we defend the idea that everything is black and white. Of course, the color metaphor simply makes the point that there is a stark difference between right and wrong, and that everything falls into one of those two categories. Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Ethics | 2 Comments

This Chivalry Thing

by Kirk Spencer

00 ThisChivalryThingWhoopi said “You have to teach women, do not live with this idea that men have this chivalry thing still with them… Don’t assume that’s still in place. So don’t be surprised if you hit a man, and he hits you back! You hit somebody. They hit you back. Don’t be surprised.”[1] The “chivalry thing,” of which Whoopi speaks, is a Christian thing. It is the marriage of the pagan virtue of ruthless strength with the Christian virtue of humble submission. The “vir” in “virtue” is “man.” And, originally, in classical times, the Latin term “virtus” meant the active and somewhat ruthless strength of “manliness.” The classical mind tried to control virtus with “disciplina” (ordering through preparation). However, this rarely worked. That brute strength of man as a brute let loose and “took care of business.” In chivalry, this brutish ruthless strength was submitted to God’s control to direct strength in order to protect the weak. So the “chivalry thing” is strength submitted and the submission was to God. Christianity made virtus into virtue and disciplina into discipleship.[2] It was a reflection of the meekness of Christ in Christian men—with the understanding that meekness is not weakness; it is strength under control, strength that protects. Chivalry was Christian meekness in defense of the defenseless. Continue reading

Posted in Culture | 2 Comments